Homily: Yr B Lent 3.
March 8 2015. St. Albans Church
Readings: Ex 20.1-17; Ps 19; 1 Cor 1.18-25; Jn 2.13-22
Knowing
God
We tend to be a legalistic
people. Not just the lawyers in here, of
which there are many, but all of us. We
like to pin things down, we like to have rules and procedures, we like stuff to
be well-defined, and we’ll narrow in on things in order to help in that
definition. Case in point: our first reading today from Exodus, probably
one of the best known sections of the Bible, and what do we call it? We call it the Ten Commandments. We’ve made movies about the Ten Commandments,
we print them on little cards, we’ve sometimes had them inscribed in our
courthouses.
However perhaps it would
surprise you to know that originally this section of the book of Exodus was
known as the “Ten Words”, or from the Greek, the Decalogue. Jewish people still refer to it as the Ten
Words, which isn’t surprising, because that’s also the way Moses puts it: “Then God spoke all these words”. And even though in most Christian traditions,
when we list the Ten Commandments, we start off with the first commandment as
“You shall have no other gods than me,” in the Jewish tradition the first word
is considered to be exactly as we find it written in the book Exodus:
“I am Yahweh, your God, who
brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.”
That’s not a commandment, is
it? It’s more of a statement of identity
and the affirmation of a relationship.
And it responds to what I believe is one of the fundamental questions of
our faith and indeed of all faiths: How
are we to know God?
The first word starts with
relationship. You know me, because I am
the one who brought you out of slavery in the land of Egypt. I am the one who spoke to Moses out of the burning
bush and gave him my name, Yahweh. We
have a relationship, you and I. I am
your God and you are my people. The rest
of the nine words then go on to tell the Israelites how they are to live as the
people of God. They are to have no other
Gods, and they are to keep Sabbath, and they are to treat each other in certain
ways, without lying and without stealing and so on, because that’s what it
means to live into their identity and vocation as God’s people.
But it all starts with the
relationship. Knowing God. How are we to know God?
Psalm 19 addresses that very
question. How are we to know God? The heavens declare the glory of God and the
firmament shows his handiwork. We can begin
to know God through the beauty and majesty of God’s creation. But we also know God through his word, the
Torah, the instruction and the laws that were revealed to us through Moses and
the prophets and have been written for us in scripture. And the psalmist also affirms that we can
know God in a more personal way, as our strength and our redeemer.
That’s how the psalmist
answers the question of knowing God. But
every generation, and each one of us has to answer that question for ourselves.
How are we to know God? It’s a big question, and any time we’re faced
with a big question, we have a tendency to narrow the question, and to narrow
the answers.
The people of Israel did
just that. As the generations passed,
and as the memory of God’s action in bringing them out of Egypt faded, the big
question of “how are we to know God?” tended to narrow into the question “What
do we have to do to keep God happy?” And
this is where a legalistic approach started to take centre stage. We must offer sacrifice. We must keep the law. These aren’t bad answers, but a focus on
practices, on what we do, is a narrowing in our relationship with God.
There was another narrowing
that took place. Instead of the big
question of “How are we to know God?”, people started focusing on the narrower
question of “Where is God?” In the days
of Moses, God was known to be in the midst of the people, in the cloud that
guided them by day and the pillar of fire that protected them at night. As God later said through the prophet Nathan,
“I moved about among all the people of Israel in a tent.”
But as the years passed, a
tent wasn’t good enough. The people wanted to pin God down more than that. They built altars on which to offer their
sacrifices, and these turned into fixed places of worship. Then, King Solomon decided that God should
live in a Temple in Jerusalem, and he built a massive structure that came to be
understood as the place both where sacrifices were to be offered and where God
was present. No longer was God
understood as moving freely in the midst of the people – the people were
instead to make pilgrimages to Jerusalem in order to be in the presence of God
and to offer the sacrifices required by the law.
The kings of Israel were
quite happy with the Temple and its sacrificial system. Not only was it well-defined, but it also
helped the kings to control the population and served as source of
revenue. The prophets however protested
against this narrowing of the relationship with God. “What to me is the multitude of your
sacrifices?” says the Lord through the prophet Isaiah. “Your new moons and your
appointed festivals my soul hates. Wash
yourselves, make yourselves clean. Cease
to do evil, learn to do good, seek justice, rescue the oppressed.” Or as the prophet Micah puts it in his rant
against the Temple system, “Shall I come before the Lord with burnt
offerings? No, what the Lord requires of
you is to do justice, love kindness and to walk humbly with your God.”
The problem with the temple
system is that when you get too focused on the “what” and the “where”, you lose
your relationship with the “who”.
This is the context when
Jesus enters Jerusalem in today’s gospel.
It is Passover, the greatest of the festivals. A festival which used to be celebrated
primarily in homes, but now requires a pilgrimage to the Temple in
Jerusalem. In the temple Jesus finds
people selling animals for sacrifice, cattle and sheep and doves, and the
moneychangers seated at their tables.
Making a whip of cords, he drives all of them out of the temple, both
the sheep and the cattle. He also pours
out the coins of the money changers and overturns their tables. “Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!”
But the temple system couldn’t
function without being a marketplace.
How could people acquire animals for the necessary sacrifices if they
weren’t for sale? How could the temple
be maintained and staff be paid without payment of the temple tax? Jesus was not calling for an end to
corruption. He wasn’t just trying to
reform the system. He was calling for
its complete destruction.
This was a high risk
strategy. Jesus’ action was
pre-meditated. He made himself a weapon,
a whip of cords. His actions were violent
and destructive. He deliberately put
himself in conflict with those in power.
This was a high risk strategy. It
was clearly high risk for Jesus, he was ultimately put to death by those in
authority. But it was also risky in
another way. Jesus is for us our role
model, our teacher. How are we to
interpret this? Is anger justified? Is violent action sometimes needed? Is this the way we should act? Jesus’ temple action leaves itself open to
misinterpretation and abuse.
Why would Jesus take such a
risk? What was at stake that would
justify such a risk?
I think that what was at
stake is the most important thing of all.
Our relationship with God.
We are constantly at risk of
turning our relationship with God into a narrow set of practices. We are constantly at risk of confining God’s
presence in our lives to a well-defined place.
Jesus with this temple
action is telling us that it’s not about our religious or ethical practices and
it’s not about a particular place where we’ve deemed God to be present. It’s not about sacrifices and obeying the
law, and it’s not about the temple. It
is about knowing God in the person of Jesus.
It’s about that relationship.
How are we to know God? The Word who was God became flesh and lived
among us. No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son who has made him
known. That’s why Jesus replaced the
temple.
Our faith is first and
foremost about knowing God. About being
in relationship with God and in relationship with all of God’s children. That’s big, and that’s hard, and like the
people of Israel, we often try to narrow it down and get legalistic about it.
Instead of asking how can we
know God, we narrow the question to what do we have to do. There are so many people who think that
Christianity is an ethical system, that it’s all basically about good
values. I often get this with parents
who bring their children for baptism. When
I ask them why, they say it’s because they want their children to have good
values, and the church can teach them that.
And sometimes I think to myself, “forget good values, I want your child
to know God. I want your child to have a
life-giving relationship with the one who created this universe and made us in
his image.” I don’t usually say that,
because having good values is a good thing, and if that’s the starting point
for faith, than that’s ok. But don’t
think that’s the end point.
There are many others who
think that Christianity is a religious system, that it’s all basically about
good religious practices. But our faith
is not about good values, nor is it about good religious practices. Our faith is much bigger than that. It is about a relationship, knowing and being
known by God.
There are people who think
that Christianity is all about going to church, going to that particular place
where we encounter God’s presence, where we meet God in the sacraments of the
church. Now I’m all in favour of going
to church. But the primary reason we come
here is so that we can intentionally learn and experience what it means to be
in relationship with God and with each other so that when we go out from here
we can continue to experience that relationship in all the places and faces of
our lives.
Our faith is not primarily
about practices and places. It is about
relationship. Knowing God and being
known by God in the community of God’s people.
That’s what was worth the risk.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment